30 January 2025
The field of human rights and SDG monitoring has been transformed in recent years by the introduction of digital tracking tools and databases. The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) presents new opportunities to further strengthen these efforts. While AI has already demonstrated its potential for social good in various policy fields, its role in human rights monitoring remains underexplored.
Our new GHRP working paper, AI Decoded: Key Concepts and Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Human Rights and SDG Monitoring, co-authored by Milica Mirković, Research Consultant at the Geneva Human Rights Platform, and Jennifer Victoria Scurrell, PhD Candidate at the Center for Security Studies (CSS) at ETH Zurich, seeks to bridge this gap by examining how AI can contribute to these areas. The paper introduces key AI and ML concepts, offering a clear understanding of their functions and applications. It explores AI’s role in advancing social good and highlights how its analytical capabilities can improve SDG monitoring and human rights tracking, ultimately fostering accountability and evidence-based policymaking.
'Leveraging AI for human rights and sustainable development work is no longer a question of possibility but of responsibility,' notes Milica Mirković. 'AI can enhance data-driven decision-making, improve accountability, and increase the accessibility of human rights monitoring. However, ensuring ethical implementation and interoperability remains key to maximizing its impact.' This perspective underscores the paper’s emphasis on AI’s potential to revolutionize data collection and analysis in human rights monitoring, while also recognizing the challenges that need to be addressed.
At the same time, the ethical risks of AI in monitoring systems—such as bias, privacy concerns, and transparency issues—cannot be overlooked. As Jennifer Victoria Scurrell points out, 'While AI presents new opportunities for human rights monitoring, it also introduces critical ethical dilemmas. Issues like bias, data privacy, and the opacity of decision-making processes need urgent attention to ensure that AI strengthens – rather than undermines – human rights protections.' The paper explores these challenges in depth, emphasizing the need for robust governance frameworks and ethical safeguards to ensure AI is used responsibly.
The publication is designed as a practical resource for professionals working at the intersection of technology, human rights, and sustainable development. Domenico Zipoli, Project Coordinator at the Geneva Human Rights Platform, highlights its significance: 'This working paper is an invaluable tool for human rights and sustainable development professionals, as it bridges technical and policy-making expertise. It represents a unique opportunity for collaboration between two leading institutions in the field of computer sciences and human rights policy.' By equipping practitioners with foundational AI knowledge, the paper aims to break down silos and foster interdisciplinary collaboration.
Looking ahead, the role of AI in this rapidly evolving field will only continue to grow. Felix Kirchmeier, Executive Director at the Geneva Human Rights Platform, reflects on the pace of change: 'The challenge now is not just about keeping up with AI advancements but shaping the ethical and regulatory frameworks that ensure AI serves as a force for good. A crucial aspect of this is equipping human rights professionals with the necessary skills to engage meaningfully with AI-driven monitoring tools. This is why the GHRP is committed to deploying specialized training within the newly established AI Skills Coalition, as part of ITU’s AI for Good initiative. By strengthening AI literacy and fostering practical capabilities, we can ensure that the human rights community is not only adapting to AI but actively shaping its responsible use.'
In an era where AI and ML are reshaping data collection, analysis, and governance across numerous fields, this paper provides a much-needed bridge between the technical and policy-making communities. By outlining key AI concepts and discussing their applications and limitations, it empowers professionals to make informed decisions about AI’s role in human rights and sustainable development governance.
Adobe
Our recent research brief, Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology, examines how effectively GDPR addresses the unique risks posed by neurodata.
Adobe
Our new research brief examines the complex relationship between digital technologies and their misuse in surveillance, cyberattacks, and disinformation campaigns.
ICRC
Co-hosted with the ICRC, this event aims to enhance the capacity of academics to teach and research international humanitarian law, while also equipping policymakers with an in-depth understanding of ongoing legal debates.
Adobe
This Human Rights Conversation will highlight the significance of academic freedom, explore its legal foundations, and examine the concrete threats it faces.
Adobe
This training course will examine how the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights have been utilized to advance the concept of business respect for human rights throughout the UN system, the impact of the Guiding Principles on other international organizations, as well as the impact of standards and guidance developed by these different bodies.
ICRC
Participants in this training course will gain practical insights into UN human rights mechanisms and their role in environmental protection and learn about how to address the interplay between international human rights and environmental law, and explore environmental litigation paths.
Adobe
This initiative wishes to contribute to better and more coordinated implementation, reporting and follow-up of international human rights recommendations through a global study on digital human rights tracking tools and databases.
Adobe Stock
This project addresses the human rights implications stemming from the development of neurotechnology for commercial, non-therapeutic ends, and is based on a partnership between the Geneva Academy, the Geneva University Neurocentre and the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy