We use various third-party cookies to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. Please use the options below to manage your cookie settings. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Please be aware, if you deny cookies, certain features of our website may not work.
This will apply to all services
Google Analytics
YouTube
13 May 2024
Our latest report, ‘Artificial Intelligence And Related Technologies In Military Decision-Making On The Use Of Force In Armed Conflicts: Current Developments And Potential Implications’, highlights and examines some of the themes that arose during two expert workshops on the role of AI-based decision support systems (AI DSS) in decision-making on the use of force in armed conflicts. Drafted by Anna Rosalie Greipl, Geneva Academy Researcher, with contributions from Neil Davison and Georgia Hinds, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the report aims to provide a preliminary understanding of the challenges and risks related to such use of AI DSS and to explore what measures may need to be implemented regarding their design and use, to mitigate risks to those affected by armed conflict.
Anna Rosalie Greipl explained, ‘The introduction of AI to DSS for military decision-making on the use of force in armed conflicts adds a new dimension to existing challenges relating to non-AI-based DSS and distinct legal and conceptual issues to those raised by Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. These systems carry the potential to reduce the human judgment involved in military decision-making on the use of force in armed conflicts in a manner that raises serious humanitarian, legal, and ethical questions.’
Georgia Hinds went on to underscore the critical role of human judgment in addressing these concerns. ‘It’s crucial to preserve human judgment when it comes to decisions on the use of force in armed conflicts. And this will have implications for the way these systems are designed and used, particularly given what we already know about how humans interact with machines, and the limitations of these systems themselves.’
The report shows that certain technical limitations of AI-DSS may be insurmountable and many existing challenges of human-AI interaction are likely to persist. It therefore may be necessary to adopt additional measures and constraints on the use of AI DSS in military decision-making on the use of force to reduce risks for people affected by armed conflicts and to facilitate compliance with IHL. To that end, it will be necessary to pursue additional research and dialogue to better understand the precise measures and constraints that may be required with regard to the design and use of AI DSS. Moreover, further analysis will be needed to identify the applications of AI DSS in this context that have the biggest impact on decisions on the use of force.
This report is part of the joint initiative ‘Digitalization of Conflict: Humanitarian Impact and Legal Protection’ between the ICRC and the Swiss Chair of International Humanitarian Law at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Other themes addressed under the project include the societal risks and humanitarian impact of cyber operations and, more recently, the legal implications of the rising civilian involvement in cyber operations.
Geneva Academy, ICRC
ICRC (AI GENERATED)
News
Adobe
Our recent research brief, Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology, examines how effectively GDPR addresses the unique risks posed by neurodata.
News
Adobe
Our research brief, Neurotechnology and Human Rights: An Audit of Risks, Regulatory Challenges, and Opportunities, examines the human rights implications of neurotechnology in both therapeutic and commercial applications.
Event
Wikimedia
In this Geneva Academy Talk Judge Lətif Hüseynov will discuss the challenges of inter-State cases under the ECHR, especially amid rising conflict-related applications.
Event
ICRC
Co-hosted with the ICRC, this event aims to enhance the capacity of academics to teach and research international humanitarian law, while also equipping policymakers with an in-depth understanding of ongoing legal debates.
Project
ICRC
As a yearly publication, it keeps decision-makers, practitioners and scholars up-to-date with the latest trends and challenges in IHL implementation in over 100 armed conflicts worldwide – both international and non-international.
Project
Adobe Stock
This project addresses the human rights implications stemming from the development of neurotechnology for commercial, non-therapeutic ends, and is based on a partnership between the Geneva Academy, the Geneva University Neurocentre and the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee.
Publication
Geneva Academy
Publication
Geneva Academy
