19 October 2023
During the latest United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) session, our Head of Research and Policy Studies Dr Erica Harper presented at a side event the situation in Afghanistan in light of new reports from Amnesty International and the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). Her address covered the classification of current armed conflicts in the country, accountability procedures, and the potential impact of investigative efforts.
Dr Harper emphasized the critical importance, within current policy reporting, of connecting the situation on the ground to its legal classification, and the relevant applicable law. She highlighted that Afghanistan is currently experiencing three distinct armed conflicts: a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) involving the Taliban and the National Resistance Front (comprised of former government military and Northern Alliance members) another NIAC between the Taliban and the Islamic State-Khorasan province, and an international armed conflict between the Taliban and Pakistan.
Dr Harper also noted that from an IHL perspective – which takes a contextually pragmatic position – the Taliban is considered Afghanistan’s de facto government, irrespective of its recognition by other states, legitimacy or how it came to power. Consequently, both IHL and IHRL are applicable bodies of law and must be respected by the Taliban.
Regarding the violations documented in the recent reports by UNAMA and Amnesty International, Dr Harper underlined that in the context of the NIAC, there may be circumstances where the loss of life is legally compliant under IHL, however, that arbitrary execution, enforced disappearances and torture are never permissible.
When asked about justice pathways, Dr Harper began by emphasizing the unsettling nature of discussing accountability while violations are ongoing. She stressed that the primary focus should remain on preventing and mitigating the loss of life and other rights violations.
However, Dr Harper acknowledged the imperfections in today’s multilateral mechanisms designed to prevent and address international peace and security breakdowns and provide justice for violations during such crises. Given this reality, she asserted the need to utilize all available tools. Moreover, in cases where a UN Security Council intervention is unfeasible and diplomatic efforts have faltered, investigations should be regarded not only as a path to accountability but also as a means to encourage belligerents to reflect on the legality of their actions.
Dr Harper underscored that when discussing investigations, quality surpasses quantity in importance. She pointed to the resumption of the International Criminal Court's criminal investigation and its potential inclusion of post-2021 crimes in the prosecutorial strategy. Additionally, she acknowledged the significant work being carried out by UNAMA. She noted that it is within the competency of the HRC to establish an investigatory mechanism, however, even here, in a more representative body, decision-making can be complex and divisive, as recently demonstrated in debates around extending the mandate of the investigation mission in Ethiopia.
Overall, Dr Harper emphasized the necessity of providing investigators with a mandate of sufficient duration and adequate resources to effectively fulfil their role. This is a challenge faced by HRC-mandated commissions of inquiry and fact-finding missions that require attention for the HRC to effectively carry out its dual role of prevention and promotion of accountability.
Our recent expert meeting, conducted in collaboration with the ICRC, addressed the growing involvement of civilians in cyber and digital operations during armed conflicts.
Hailing from 30 different countries, the 44 participants bring a wealth of experience from a wide range of sectors, including international organizations, NGOs, government entities, development agencies, law firms, and the private sector.
Panelists will address the relevance of the case for armed conflict classification, rebel governance, the protection of cultural property in armed conflicts, and the nexus requirement.
After having followed this online short course, participants will know who the protected persons and goods are and what rules of IHL can be used for their protection in an international armed conflict. An overview of the rules applicable in non-international armed conflicts will also be given.
This online short course will examine the sources of international humanitarian law (IHL), as well as the threshold criteria for its applicability in an armed conflict
After having provided academic support to the negotiation of the UN Declaration for ten years, this research project focuses on the implementation of the UN Declaration on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas.
This project addresses the human rights implications stemming from the development of neurotechnology for commercial, non-therapeutic ends, and is based on a partnership between the Geneva Academy, the Geneva University Neurocentre and the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee.