Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy>
Professor Marco Sassòli has been appointed on 15 March as one of three experts on a mission to investigate violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) in Ukraine for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).
This mission was conducted under the Moscow Mechanism, at the request of Ukraine and following the suggestion of 45 participating States. The report of the three experts was to be submitted within three weeks of the establishment of the mission, which was possible despite the scale of the situation, which continues to evolve. However, the mission was no longer able to analyse the allegations of horrific massacres that had emerged since 1 April 2022.
Oleksandr Ratushnyak / UNDP Ukraine >
Professor Sassòli was in charge of the IHL part of the report. In that part, the mission found that, during the period under consideration, violations of IHL occurred both on the Ukrainian as well as on Russian sides. It also found that both sides have also, in many instances, respected IHL. The Russian violations are, however, more serious in nature and scale.
Regarding violations of IHL, the mission found clear patterns of violations by the Russian forces on many of the issues investigated. This concerns in particular their conduct of hostilities.
‘It is not conceivable that so many civilians would have been killed and injured and so many civilian objects, including houses, hospitals, cultural property, schools, multi-story residential buildings, administrative buildings, penitentiary institutions, police stations, water stations and electricity systems would have been damaged or destroyed if Russia had respected its IHL obligations in terms of distinction, proportionality and precautions in conducting hostilities in Ukraine’ underlines Professor Sassòli.
‘The conduct of the siege of Mariupol is an extreme example. Much of the conduct of Russian forces in parts of Ukraine it occupied before and after 24 February 2022, including through its proxies, the self-proclaimed ‘republics’ of Donetsk and Luhansk, equally violates IHL of military occupation’ he adds.
Some violations and problems were also identified regarding the practices of Ukraine.
‘The mission is in particular concerned about the treatment of prisoners of war, originally considered criminals, and treated in ways that are incompatible with Geneva Convention III. However, allegations that Ukraine and not Russia had caused some of the death, injury or destructions attributed to Russia by the media, Ukrainian authorities and NGOs could not be confirmed’ explains Professor Sassòli.
‘The mission is also astonished about the small number of prisoners of war acknowledged by both parties and regrets that they do not yet benefit from ICRC visits prescribed by Geneva Convention III’ he adds.
Professor Sassòli could not have written his part in such a short time without the decisive help of his doctoral student at the University of Geneva, Ms Eugénie Duss, and of two Geneva Academy alumni who do not wish to be identified, one of whom, standing in midst of professional life, having offered spontaneously his pro bono assistance for more than one week, several years after having graduated at the Geneva Academy.
Oleksandr Ratushniak / UNDP Ukraine
Oleksandr Ratushniak / UNDP Ukraine
During one week, Francesca Gortan, Sarah Surget and Sophie Timmermans represented the Geneva Academy at the 38th Edition of the Jean-Pictet Competition that took place in Durrës, Albania, from 19 to 26 March.
Discover our resources and what our experts say about the situation in Ukraine, with regular updates to include new events, articles and comments!
In this online event co-organized with the ATLAS Network, prominent women in international law will share their experience and advice through an interactive discussion.
This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, will cover the ‘nuts and bolts’ of implementation, including national legislation, dissemination and training, and discuss the mechanisms such as the International Fact-Finding Commission, as set out in the treaties.
This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, discusses the extent to which states may limit and/or derogate from their international human rights obligations in order to prevent and counter-terrorism and thus protect persons under their jurisdiction.
This project aims at compiling and analysing the practice and interpretation of selected international humanitarian law and human rights norms by armed non-state actors (ANSAs). It has a pragmatic double objective: first, to offer a comparative analysis of IHL and human rights norms from the perspective of ANSAs, and second, to inform strategies of humanitarian engagement with ANSAs, in particular the content of a possible ‘Model Code of Conduct’.
This project examined how IHL could be more systematically, appropriately and correctly dealt with by the human rights mechanisms emanating from the UN Charter, as well as from universal and regional treaties.