The Involvement of Mercenaries and Private Military Security Companies in Armed Conflicts: What does IHL Say?

Several armed conflicts classified in our RULAC online portal see the participation of mercenaries or private military security companies (PMSC) alongside states’ armed forces. This is notably the case for instance in Mozambique and Nagorno Karabakh.

Dr Chiara Redaelli, in charge of RULAC and an expert in international humanitarian law (IHL), answers our questions regarding what IHL says about this phenomenon.

Does IHL allow the participation of private military security companies and mercenaries in armed conflicts?

First of all, it is necessary to distinguish between private military security companies (PMSCs) and mercenaries. PMSCs are private business entities that provide military or security assistance to states, companies, or other organizations. On the other hand, mercenaries are defined in Article 47 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (AP I). It should be noted that seldom the staff of PMSCs can be considered a mercenary as defined in AP I.

IHL does not prohibit the use of PMSCs and mercenaries during armed conflicts. Nevertheless, two conventions ban the use of mercenaries in armed conflicts: the 1977 Organisation of African Unity Convention for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa and the 1989 International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries. These conventions criminalize not only the resort to mercenaries but also the participation in armed conflicts as a mercenary.

What is their status?

Under IHL, staff of PMSCs and mercenaries as considered civilians. This means that they have no right to directly participate in hostilities and, if captured, they are not entitled to prisoner of war status. In any case, this does not mean that they are never protected under IHL, as they enjoy the protection granted by the Fourth Geneva Convention to civilians.

Are they legitimate targets under IHL?

Just like civilians, PMSCs staff and mercenaries are not legitimate targets unless and for such time as they take direct participation in hostilities. However, this is particularly challenging with regard to PMSCs that have only defensive functions, as it is often the case: how to distinguish between acts of self-defence and direct participation in hostilities?

The question is crucial because PMSC staff is a lawful target only if they take direct participation in hostilities, not during self-defence activities. While the debate is still open, it should be noted that even defensive functions may amount to an armed attack as defined in IHL (Article 49 AP I), and hence qualify as direct participation in hostilities.

Is IHL applicable to PMSCs and mercenaries?

Just like all actors present in a country affected by an armed conflict, IHL is applicable to PMSCs staff and mercenaries, who are therefore bound by IHL and are criminally responsible should their conduct amount to war crimes.

Specifically, with regard to PMSCs, the Montreux Document is a non-binding inter-state instrument that aims at guiding states in their use of PMSCs. Furthermore, the International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers (ICoCa) is the only instrument that lists the obligations of PMSCs. The main PMSCs have signed the document and have committed to implementing its obligations.

Can a private military security company be a party to an armed conflict?

Generally speaking, PMSCs are not a party to the conflict. As mentioned before, their staff may qualify as civilians taking direct participation in hostilities, should their actions qualify as direct participation in hostilities (Article 51(3) of AP I, Article 13(3) of Additional Protocol II).

The only case when a PMSC could be a party to an armed conflict would be if the company itself started engaging in hostilities as an autonomous party, i.e. not as providing a service to a client. In this case, it would be necessary to assess whether the two criteria required by IHL are met, namely (1) the violence between the PMSC and the adverse party needs to meet the threshold of intensity and (2) the PMSC must be sufficiently organized.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

Eliska Mockova with colleagues from the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Urkaine News

LLM in International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights: What our Alumni Say

27 January 2022

Eliška Mocková graduated from our LLM in International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights in 2019 and currently works for the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, in one of its field offices.

Read more

Members of the 2022 Geneva Academy Pictet Team News

Our 2022 Pictet Team

24 January 2022

Francesca Gortan, Sarah Surget and Sophie Timmermans will represent the Geneva Academy at the 38th Edition of the Jean-Pictet Competition that will take place from 19 to 26 March in Durrës, Albania.

Read more

Cover page of the book Event

Book Launch: ‘Unravelling Unlawful Confinement in Contemporary Armed Conflicts’

25 May 2022, 18:00-20:00

This event marks the launch of our LLM alumna Jelena Plamenac’s award-winning book ‘Unravelling Unlawful Confinement in Contemporary Armed Conflicts’ published by Brill.

Read more

Yemen,  Sana'a, Faj Attan district. Destruction. Short Course

From Use of Force to Responsibility to Protect

19 May - 3 June 2022

This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, provides an overview of the evolution of the rules governing the use of force in international law, focusing on military intervention on humanitarian grounds and the creation of the United Nations collective security system. It then addresses the concept of the responsibility to protect.

Read more

Central African Republic, Ouham province, village of Ouogo. International Humanitarian Law dissemination session to members of the Peoples' Army for the Restoration of Democracy. Project

From Words to Deeds: A Study of Armed Non-State Actors’ Practice and Interpretation of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Norms

Started in January 2017

This project aims at compiling and analysing the practice and interpretation of selected international humanitarian law and human rights norms by armed non-state actors (ANSAs). It has a pragmatic double objective: first, to offer a comparative analysis of IHL and human rights norms from the perspective of ANSAs, and second, to inform strategies of humanitarian engagement with ANSAs, in particular the content of a possible ‘Model Code of Conduct’.

Read more

Surveillance Camera Project

COUNTER-TERROR PROJECT: A LEGAL EMPIRICAL APPROACH

Started in June 2019

The ‘Counter-Terror Pro LegEm’ project combines legal analysis with social science research to (1) examine the effectiveness of counterterrorism measures and their effects on human rights and (2) analyse the structure of terrorist networks such as Al Qaeda or the Islamic State and see whether they qualify as ‘organized armed groups’ for the purpose of international humanitarian law.

Read more

Cover of the Publication Publication

The Future Digital Battlefield and Challenges for Humanitarian Protection: A Primer

published on April 2022

Henning Lahmann

Read more