Cha già José>
27 August 2020
Our new Research Brief Switzerland’s Foreign Policy and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants lists actions that countries should take to ensure that their foreign policy is consistent with the United Nations (UN) Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, adopted by the United Nations in 2018.
The recommendations set out in the Research Brief will be relevant to many countries, even if the analysis focuses on Swiss foreign policy.
Switzerland was active during the negotiations and has continued to be since then. The Research Brief – available in English, French and German – focuses on steps that Switzerland should take to ensure that its foreign policy is consistent with the Declaration.
Co-authored by our Senior Research Fellow and Strategic Adviser on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Dr Christophe Golay and Caroline Dommen, Independent Researcher in human rights, economics and sustainable development,
the Research Brief recalls that in order to implement the Declaration, Switzerland must ensure that its policies relating to trade, intellectual property and development cooperation are in line with the rights recognized in the Declaration. Based on a series of examples the Research Brief notes that much remains to be done. It offers recommendations to Swiss officials as to steps that should be taken to bring the country’s foreign policy in line with its human rights commitments.
‘Switzerland played a key role during the negotiation of the Declaration. It can and must now position itself as a leader in the Declaration’s implementation. It can do so by supporting, through its foreign policy, the promotion and protection of the rights enshrined in the Declaration both in Switzerland, in other countries, and at the global level’ emphasizes Dr Golay.
Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy
The Research Brief, published jointly with the Swiss Coalition of the Friends of the Declaration on the Rights of Peasants, summarizes the main points of a detailed study by the same authors, which is available in French.
CIFOR>
‘Despite the obvious problems of the current trading system for the environment, peasants, resilience and global food security, new trade agreements essentially replicate those adopted last century. New trade-related commitments are made without sufficient study of the impacts of similar existing commitments and almost without attempting to anticipate and avoid their possible negative effects on the most vulnerable, including peasants. This lack of assessments represents a missed opportunity to generate knowledge, making it difficult to adapt the agreements under negotiation to the specific needs of peasants’ explains Caroline Dommen.
‘There are also tensions between the international intellectual property regime – defined by the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants – and peasants’ right to seeds. In its foreign policy on intellectual property, Switzerland must ensure that it respects its commitments to protect human rights, including the rights to food and to seeds, which is not the case today’ recalls Dr Golay.
CIFOR>
The authors stress that the right to participation of peasants, recognized by the Declaration, is fundamental to its implementation.
‘While in Switzerland the participation of peasants is important in the development of national laws and policies, it remains weak in many aspects of Swiss foreign policy. Surveys have shown, for example, that during the negotiations for the European Free Trade Association-Mercosur agreement, none of the eight countries consulted or allowed the participation of stakeholders from the peasant or rural world’ explains Caroline Dommen.
‘Many development cooperation actors also seem to be unaware of the fact that programmes or projects in many areas beyond food security or agriculture, may affect the peasant community’ she adds.
One of the complexities highlighted by the authors is the fact that different parts of the federal administration undertake foreign policy activities that affect peasants. These include several divisions of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs and the Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.
‘An effort must, therefore, be made to raise awareness of the content of the Declaration in these different parts of the federal administration, including on the impact that their interventions can have on the rights of peasants. The first step in this direction will be the meeting that we will have with them in Bern to discuss the main findings and recommendations of our research’ say the authors.
Adobe
A new working paper, 'AI Decoded: Key Concepts and Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Human Rights and SDG Monitoring', has been published by the Geneva Human Rights Platform.
CCPR Centre
Via its DHRTTDs Directory, the Geneva Human Rights Platform provides a comprehensive list and description of such key tools and databases. But how to navigate them? Which tool should be used for what, and by whom? This interview helps us understand better the specificities of the current highlight of the directory: ICCPR Follow-up World Maps
Adobe
This training course, specifically designed for staff of city and regional governments, will explore the means and mechanisms through which local and regional governments can interact with and integrate the recommendations of international human rights bodies in their concrete work at the local level.
Adobe
This initiative wishes to contribute to better and more coordinated implementation, reporting and follow-up of international human rights recommendations through a global study on digital human rights tracking tools and databases.
The Geneva Human Rights Platform contributes to this review process by providing expert input via different avenues, by facilitating dialogue on the review among various stakeholders, as well as by accompanying the development of a follow-up resolution to 68/268 in New York and in Geneva.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy